
(1) There are many typing errors in the manuscript.
What is "105GH" or what is "0.127mmt"?

(2) At 100GHz the free-space wavelength is 3mm. In the
proposed teflon substrate this becomes about 2mm.
The proposed microstrip width of 0.39mm therefore
corresponds to 0.19labmda. Such a microstrip line can
no longer be considered TEM. Therefore its voltage is
undefined and strictly speaking its characteristic 
impedance is not defined either. There are many
incompatible definitions of the characteristic
impedance for non-TEM transmission lines. Therefore you
have to mention what are you actually calculating?

(3) It does not make sense to manufacture the proposed
device and making measurements in the frequency band
from 75GHz to 105GHz. In the latter band, all available test
equipment, especially connectors, are not very accurate
nor repeatable. In order to test a theoretical design, it
makes sense to build a scaled model operating at lower
frequencies, where the available test equipment is much
more accurate.

(4) There is no photo of the prototype?
